> 
> The problem is that some clue-less newbies are not willing to take a
> look at archives of the conference to find that exactly this kind of
> stuff (recreating LyX into WYSIWYG junk like SWP for those who want
> SWP, but are not willing to bite a bullet and pay its price) repeats
> periodically and people on this periodically explain why LaTeX is not
> and *should not* be WYSIWYG.
> 

I never mentioned WYSIWYG. ALl i mentioned is freedom to typeset your
document however the hell you want it; even if this includes having mile
long gaps around your titles. In the end it's your document, you'll have
to pay the price if it looks like crap.

-- 

Thomi Richards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to