Am Samstag, 08.02.03 um 22:50 Uhr schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
Till von Reumont wrote:I do not use this style, but readingthanx. now it doesn't produce any error messages any more. thats good. one thing though: the references in my text now appear without any parenthesis like "(" or ")" or "[, ]" around them. in the bibliography at the end of the ducument they have them: [Miller 2002] for example. is that a bug or a feature? do i have to use a command other than just "\cite"?
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/biblio/bibtex/contrib/german/dinat/ index.html
shows that you have to use natbib. Therefor, check "use natbib" in the
Documents dialog (xforms: Extras, qt: Bibliography). Then you can chose
between different citation styles in the citation dialog.
cool. that did the job! thanks alot!
ok, this one did not work. first i got the error message that "push.edition" is already a type "wizard defined" function. so i gave it a new name and in line 120 i definedanother question: why do all the din styles not display the german wordI don't know if that is because of DIN but it is a matter of how it is coded
for edition (auflage) in the bibliography? they just print the number
and that's it... the geralpha does print the german words, so if i put
the word "auflage" in my bibliography file manually in every entry, i
will get the word twice if i ever use geralpha, and a funny combination
(6. auflage edition) with all the english styles, right?
in the bst file. You can modify dinat.bst in an editor like this (untested):
Add around line 120:
FUNCTION {push.edition} { "Aufl." }
and modify the function in line 880ff, i.e. replace with this:
FUNCTION {push.edition}
% like in entry
{ edition empty$
{ "" }
{ edition "~" * push.edition * }
if$
}
FUNCTION {push.auflage} { "Auf\/l." }
but then i got errors telling me "the literal isn't empty". so in line 880ff i had to make a few corrections for it to work:
FUNCTION {push.edition}
% like in entry
{ edition empty$
{ "" }
{ edition push.auflage * }
if$
}
now it works perfrectly!