Am 14.03.22 um 08:59 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users:
Am 14.03.22 um 08:33 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users:
Am 14.03.22 um 08:10 schrieb Herbert Voss via lyx-users:
Am 14.03.22 um 08:07 schrieb Herbert Voss via lyx-users:
Am 14.03.22 um 07:58 schrieb Herbert Voss via lyx-users:
Am 14.03.22 um 07:53 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users:
Am 14.03.22 um 07:51 schrieb Herbert Voss via lyx-users:
Am 14.03.22 um 07:47 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users:
Example:
was shown by Muller^7 and ...
The Bibliography shows the full reference Muller...
This _is_ \footcite{key} with a short reference as footnote and
bib as usual.
Herbert
I meant ONLY the ^7, WITHOUT the footnote
then you also need a bibliography in numeric style. But spbasic has
a bib in author-year-style
Herbert
What would be the next best numeric style to spbasic ?
there is no best, it is the default style "numeric" with changing
\cite
to footnotes.
You can try "style=nature" instead of footnotes
sorry, read "instead of numeric"
Herbert
Thanks, Herbert, for the proposals. I Will take the Nature style.
Wolfgang
I selected biblatex citation style Nature and kept biblatex-spbasic for
the bibliography style. The citations are now in [number], but that's ok.
Thanks, Herbert, for the suggestion.
Wolfgang
Addendum:
This is of course nonsense:
"I selected biblatex citation style Nature and kept biblatex-spbasic for
> the bibliography style."
I can't keep biblatex-spbasic, since it is not numeric.
The bibliography style should also be Nature
Wolfgang
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
