On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 09:23 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Hi LyXers,
>>
>> we will add support for microtype into LyX.
>>
>> I would like to get some feedback from users who already use this package
>> about their workflow. Do you
>>
>> 1. just load the package in preamble via \usepackage{microtype}
>
I usually do (1).
>> 2. usually add few more parameters via \usepackage[param1]{microtype}
>> 3. use heavy loaded settings to get what you need
>> ?
>>
>> (I'm trying to figure out how much space for param tuning should
>> be left for user in the interface.)
>
> I think maybe the compatibility option would be worth implementing in
> the GUI, but for the most part the options seem pretty specialized to
> me, and simply being able to activate microtype might be enough. People
> who want more could add it themselves, as now.
>
I'm with Richard here: Simple step (1) checkbox might be sufficient.
If someone makes use of complicated microtype parameters, then
Preamble seems the way to go (instead of the GUI checkbox).
The only question: what happens if user has selected both checkbox and
added a separate \usepackage[param1]{microtype} call in Preamble?
Liviu
> Richard
>
>>
>> Pavel
>
--
Do you think you know what math is?
http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/ian-stewart-2013-08-02
Or what it means to be intelligent?
http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/john-duncan-2013-08-30
Think again:
http://www.ideasroadshow.com/library
