Am Montag, 22. Januar 2001 15:01 schrieb Tuukka Toivonen:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Stephan E. Schlierf wrote:
> > Am Montag, 22. Januar 2001 12:14 schrieb Tuukka Toivonen:
> > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Stephan E. Schlierf wrote:
> > > > > First, can you please tell me why my pdf output from Lyx 1.1.6 has
> > > > > such fuzzy looking fonts?
> > > > > http://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn/ps707/syl01.pdf
> > >
> > > You're using wrong pdf viewer. Use "gv", not Acroread.
> >
> > I don´t want to doubt your experiences but no matter if I use Acroread,
> > kghostview or whatever the result is all the same (and looks fine, btw)
>
> Well, maybe newer versions of acroread support antialiased bitmapped fonts
> too.
I´m using Acrobat Reader 4.0...
>
> It is true that with gv bitmapped fonts do look more fuzzy than outline
> fonts (probably because ghostscript tries to be smart and not to antialias
> vertical and horizontal lines) but, IMHO, the fully antialiased bitmapped
> fonts look actually better (because the vertical and horizontal line edges
> have better than integer pixel position).
>
> Any way to enable full antialiasing in ghostscript even with outline
> fonts?
I´m sorry, but I´m not so familiar with ghostscript or gv. The version of
ghostscript I use is 6.0 - and after a little bit of copying the right files
to their right place (I think this depends on the distribution - mine is
SuSE) is worked perfectly.
>
> > > Use "Layout/Document/Fonts" and select eg. pslatex from there. You'll
> > > lose the cool computer modern fonts but at least they will be outline
> > > fonts then--except some math.
> >
> > and what happens when using, say, "newcent" ?
>
> Interesting experiment. Now I still get bitmapped font with ps2pdf--but
> with pdflatex I get outline fonts!
Just a guess: what about including "\usepackage[ps2pdf] in you LaTeX-preamble?
--
Stephan E. Schlierf M.A.
- Leiter Konzeptentwicklung -
speed2web GmbH Germany
FON: ++49 921 99 00 86 12
FAX: ++49 921 99 00 86 70
http://www.speed2web.de
