Herbert,
let me thank you first of all for your fast response that answered my
questions right down to the point.
>
> it's better to use the environment
> \begin{appendix}
> ... bla bla bla ...
> \end{appendix}
>
> than you can put other lists behind the appendix, like the
> index.
That's a useful hint. Thanks !
> \renewcommand*\appendix{\par\global\@altsecnumformattrue
> \setcounter{chapter}{0}%
> \setcounter{section}{0}%
> \renewcommand*\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
> \renewcommand*\thechapter{\appendixname\ \@Alph\c@chapter}}
This works brillantly. Unfortunately, I have a lot of equations and some
figures in the appendix. The effect of the above lines on these items
is, that they are now all labeled like: (Anhang A.1), and similarly for
figures: Abbildung Anhang A.1, which looks a bit awkward.
It might be easier now to just have a general heading `Anhang' (or
`Anhaenge') for the appendix which also shows up in the TOC. After that
heading, the titles of the appendices could then just be given as:
A. title
.
.
B. title
.
and so on.
(BTW, is \appendixname in the above code the variable or function that
contains `Anhang' for german language ?)
I realize that my problem seems to be more of a general LaTeX nature (or
Koma-Script nature) than actually a problem with LyX.
Sorry for the bandwidth used here !
> before the line \begin{appendix} write in your text as tex
> (red)
>
> \addcontentsline{toc}{part}{Anhang}
>
> for a right table of contents you need some additional
> horizontal space
> in fact
> of Anhang A ..., so put in latex preamble:
>
> \newcommand*\l@chapter[2]{%
> \ifnum \c@tocdepth >\m@ne
> \addpenalty{-\@highpenalty}%
> \vskip 1.0em \@plus\p@
> \setlength\@tempdima{6em}% <-- the important line
> \begingroup
> \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth
> \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth
> \leavevmode \sectfont
> \advance\leftskip\@tempdima
> \hskip -\leftskip
> #1\nobreak\hfil \nobreak\hb@xt@\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
> \penalty\@highpenalty
> \endgroup
> \fi}
>
> there might be an easier solution, but i do not know a lot
> of pure tex-code.
Well you seem to know a lot of pure LaTeX-code anyway. :-)
I have not tried this recommendation of yours at the moment, but I will
soon.
>
> hope, this helps
>
> Herbert
>
Thank you again for your help !
Marco
