Re: [Path] BufferView::Pimpl::updateMetrics() simple optimization

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| -     Paragraph & par = text->getPar(pit);
| +     Paragraph const & const par = text->getPar(pit);
| 
| (OK, I may have added too many consts, but they do help the compiler
| to generate better code, and it makes the intent of the code clearer)

What is the difference between 

         "Foo const & const"

and

         "Foo const &"
??

How is the other more const than the other?
(For pointers it makes sense, but does it for references?)

-- 
        Lgb