Edwin Leuven wrote: > so i don't understand why you are blocking this...
This has been mentioned already: Most of us agree that the current default is bad, but if you ask what should be done instead there is no such good agreement anymore. Furthermore, this default has been like that for years. Therefore, if you change it, you should not use an intermediate solution that some people don't like, but a 'final' version that can be customized, i.e. the discussed table template. Otheriwse users will have to adjust two times to changed UI, and this is bad. Georg
