Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | <no-smiley day>
| > | Yes, I would drop all other front ends from trunk immediately.
| > | </no-smiley day>
| > So we should keep only the one that is possible to use on most
| > distros
| > and platforms then? Qt3 it is. I'll commence with the deleteion of the
| > others right away.
|
| Still the same old song... The moment LyX requires Qt4, as most
| distros will want to have LyX they will package Qt4 anyway. So your
| point is void.
Well... my point is that we cannot delete frontends just because it is
easier to work with just one.
I am saying that we should delete them but maybe not force all and every
change to happen on all frontend at the same time. We should choose one
(qt4) and let the other frontends be developed by those interested in them.
Do you really belive LyX is a driver for distros to use Qt4?
I believe it could be one driver among others yes. Many people use LyX.
Abdel.