On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:54:16AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> | On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:24:51PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> | > On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:14:19AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> | > 
> | > ...
> | >  
> | > > PS Getting rid of Wide() would only be possible if you have, inside
> | > > insettext, access to the _maximum_ left and right edges of the contained
> | > > text, rather than the _actual_ ones... 
> | > 
> | > Yesss! This is precisely the solution. Patch forthcoming...
> | > 
> | > Nothing as inspiring as a weekend in nature.
> | 
> | Here's the patch you've been looking for... it simplifies things which
> | is always a good sign.
> 
> Except that you are not getting rid of Wide() :-)

:-)

I could change the name... fullWidth() ?
 
> But the patch is nice anyhow.
> 
> 
> -- 
>       Lgb

- Martin

Attachment: pgpoDx81GOPxE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to