Georg Baum wrote: > In the meantime I had a look at your patch, and I like it very much. I > agree with Lars that this hardcoding stuff is not nice, but I think that > should be enough for now. For the future, I'd like to avoid yet another set > of configuration files. I think this problem could be solved if we made the > layout files more flexible in such a way that we could add a feature to all > existing document classes. This could be useful for new environments (e.g. > theorems or special quotation styles) that are in principle independant > from the document class (in LaTeX terms .sty vs. .cls). Such a feature > could as well be a new font family.
Agreed (we need something like this also for charstyles probably). Anyway, let's do this in a separate step. > I'll have a look at the lyx2lyx stuff laater this week if Jose does not > beat me to it. Please don't apply your patch without lyx2lyx support. Thanks. I won't apply anyway, the patch isn't finished yet. Please just send the lyx2lyx patch when it's ready, I'll apply all in one step then. Jürgen
