Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 15:22 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| >
| > | We have a drawing error with insets. It is very easy to see with the
| > | note inset. Just load the userguide, look at the 'Note' inset near the
| > | top, place the cursor within it and see the background and frame
| > | change.
| > |
| > | If the note is not the first item in the paragraph -> no error
| > | If the note contains just one paragraph -> no error
| > |
| > | I so far fail to see just where the logic in our drawing fails, any
| > | help appreciated.
| > |
| > | Is this bug also present in 1.4?
| >
| > This bug is caused by r13328:
|
| Am I right in suspecting that what you call a "bug" is in fact my design
| choice / visual innovation? If so, I resent it... stop calling names ;-)
Possibly. I'd still call it a bug though.
We should find a better solution. The Wide() thing really feels like a
hack. (And there should be no reason why a Wide() non-Wide() have to
be drawn differently.)
--
Lgb
