On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 09:30 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 15:22 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: > | > > | > | We have a drawing error with insets. It is very easy to see with the > | > | note inset. Just load the userguide, look at the 'Note' inset near the > | > | top, place the cursor within it and see the background and frame > | > | change. > | > | > | > | If the note is not the first item in the paragraph -> no error > | > | If the note contains just one paragraph -> no error > | > | > | > | I so far fail to see just where the logic in our drawing fails, any > | > | help appreciated. > | > | > | > | Is this bug also present in 1.4? > | > > | > This bug is caused by r13328: > | > | Am I right in suspecting that what you call a "bug" is in fact my design > | choice / visual innovation? If so, I resent it... stop calling names ;-) > > Possibly. I'd still call it a bug though. > > We should find a better solution. The Wide() thing really feels like a > hack. (And there should be no reason why a Wide() non-Wide() have to > be drawn differently.)
I haven't been able to. And I really tried... - Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
