>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> I would think that instead of immediate updates, some Andre> 'invalidation' could happen that could be accumulated until a Andre> real 'update' is needed. Andre> This way, any function changing e.g. a paragraph's contents Andre> could 'invalidate the paragraph' and we do not have to second Andre> guess what exactly happened in the dipatch(). This makes much sense indeed. We could invalidate single rows too. JMarc
