On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:00:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> >>  Because we had a completely different update system?
> 
> Martin> Yes, that's what I suspect too. So we must get this working
> Martin> from scratch then.
> 
> Martin> Could lyxfunc be made sensitive to LyXAction flags? Would that
> Martin> be part of a solution?
> 
> Maybe, but what flag? Or add a fitcursor() member to DispatchResult?

Could NoUpdate be overloaded for this?
 
> A LyXAction flag would be useful to handle this new member easily in
> the easy cases (like we do with NoUpdate).
> 
> The best is probably to force a fitcursor only when needed. And idea:
> what about doing a fitcursor when the cursor has changed? Does it make
> sense?

But that won't help in this problem case. The cursor _has_ changed and
we do _not_ want to do a fitcursor operation.

- Martin

Attachment: pgpLrT4qxAz2B.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to