On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 10:57 +0100, Jose' Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 19 April 2006 07:52, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Sorry for the long analysis. Jose, do you agree? > > I guess so, after such throughout explanation it is difficult not to > agree. :-) > > Since you understand both codes, I would vote for this code inclusion in > both trunk and 1.4. > > Could you do it, please?
But first of all, Garst, does it do the job? - Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
