On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 07:29 -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > >On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 10:57 +0100, Jose' Matos wrote: > > > > > >>On Wednesday 19 April 2006 07:52, Martin Vermeer wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Sorry for the long analysis. Jose, do you agree? > >>> > >>> > >> I guess so, after such throughout explanation it is difficult not to > >>agree. :-) > >> > >> Since you understand both codes, I would vote for this code inclusion in > >>both trunk and 1.4. > >> > >> Could you do it, please? > >> > >> > > > >But first of all, Garst, does it do the job? > > > > > No. The patch made no change to the exported .tex file. The c is still a > c, not a t. > > Garst
Jose? Where is the right place? - Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
