On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 10:38:08AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Georg Baum a écrit : > > Am Freitag, 14. April 2006 10:09 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > >> Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : > >>> Why isn't the two first lines deleted? > >> Because I know sxxt about M4 :-) > >> I suppose I can delete that but then what's the use of cygwin.m4? Could > >> we just delete the file and let it rest in peace? > > > > Yes, if this check is not needed anymore then you should delete cygwin.m4. > > OK, thanks. > But before I do that, I need Enrico advice. Enrico, is there any option > that you set manually that could end-up in this file? I was thinking of > the -mno-cygwin option...
I think I am the last one who has a say on this. However, there is something that could help. If possible, it would be nice to have added to CXXFLAGS the define "-DQ_CYGWIN_WIN" *when* the option --without-x is passed to configure *and* platform is cygwin. I am no m4 expert, but could see what I can do. Anyway, this is not strictly necessary as that define can be set through CPPFLAGS. I don't think that it is wise to fiddle with the -mno-cygwin option, though, as it requires that you really know what you are doing, and I think you know what I mean. -- Enrico
