>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> 0: ct status "on" in this buffer 1: ct status "off" in this Juergen> buffer -1: ct status "unknown" in this buffer Juergen> the value is only important on paste, because then we have to Juergen> differentiate the ct status of the buffer we're pasting into Juergen> (the int) and the ct status of the pasted paragraphs. This is OK. But I'd rather have a enum. Actually, with this enum and maybe a few comment, I am OK with this patch in 1.4.2. >> What does a not tracked paragraph in a tracked buffer mean? Juergen> If we copy a paragraph in a buffer where ct is disabled and Juergen> then switch on ct before pasting, this happens. >> I am not keen on applying it now, to be frank. Juergen> Too bad. It works perfectly for me. You are right. The patch is as clean as it can be considering how change tracking works now. It is Michael's cleanup that will improve the situation in 1.5. JMarc