>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Actually, with this enum and maybe a few comment, I am OK with this >> patch in 1.4.2. Juergen> What about the attached? It looks OK to me, except - void cleanChanges(); + void cleanChanges(Paragraph::ChangeTracking ct = Paragraph::CT_Unknown); where I think the Paragraph:: specifier is not needed. Unless someone complains it is OK for branch and trunk. JMarc