>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Actually, with this enum and maybe a few comment, I am OK with this
>> patch in 1.4.2.

Juergen> What about the attached?

It looks OK to me, except
-       void cleanChanges();
+       void cleanChanges(Paragraph::ChangeTracking ct = Paragraph::CT_Unknown);
where I think the Paragraph:: specifier is not needed.

Unless someone complains it is OK for branch and trunk.

JMarc

Reply via email to