>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I have to improve my English as you don't seem to Abdelrazak> understand me. I am talking about an easier way to improve Abdelrazak> a patch in a public way instead of sending back and forth Abdelrazak> the updated patch. When the patch meets your personal Abdelrazak> quality expectation then you can merge it to trunk. If you Abdelrazak> want an analogy, that would be a bit similar to what Abdelrazak> Andrew Morton is doing for the kernel. That experimental Abdelrazak> branch would be a repository for patch that are in need to Abdelrazak> be reviewed and/or corrected. That would work if we had hundreds of developers and testers. Nobody is going to check out yet another branch. We already have problems to have people test both the 1.4 and 1.5 version correctly. JMarc
