Georg Baum a écrit :
Am Freitag, 31. März 2006 10:21 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Agreed, a knowledgeable python programmer could do it in no time. A C++
version could be more complicated. Also I don't know if this is the case
already (I think so) but it is (should be) an unsynchronized process;
i.e. we don't have to wait for the process to complete. So going for C++
probably won't speed up the thing.
My question was: If we want to go C++, why the additional python effort?
Because the python effort is supposed to be easy.
If you suggest to use python instead of C++: That is also fine with me,
but IMO we should not do both.
IMO, we should do the easy thing first. Then, if somebody comes with a
C++ solution that shows advantages over the python solution, we should
switch to it. Of course if you come with a C++ solution before the
python one, this would be even better. But in the mean time...
As a side note (and this is not aimed at you), I don't understand this
philosophy of retaining any change because there is some hypothetical
solution to a problem that should be done first.
Abdel.
