>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I think we should give most of the "Small fixes, working patches >> avail." a 1.4.1 target. When they are all in and working then: Juergen> Jean-Marc, what procedure do you prefer? Should we propagate Juergen> our fixes or do you just tell us when a fix should be Juergen> applied? I prefer the latter, of course :-) I will try to go through the 1.4.1 bugs with patches and annotate them. Anyway, we have to wait for 1.4.0 before doing anything. Also, we have 27 1.4.1 bugs without a patch. Among them, 8 are marked easyfix: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&target_milestone=1.4.1&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=anywords&keywords=easyfix&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=minor&bug_severity=trivial&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&namedcmd=Bugs+for+1.4.0&newqueryname=&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= They would be good candidates for 1.4.1 if someone produces the patches. Otherwise, all these 1.4.1 bugs without patch will be retargeted to 1.4.2. JMarc
