On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 10:53 -0500, Bennett Helm wrote: > On Mar 7, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > >> What's the status of 2195 <http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi? > >> id=2195>? Martin's singlerow10.diff <http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx- > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg85934.html> works very well on Mac, though it > >> does have a minor problem with screen drawing in some circumstances. > >> (I'll post a note on bugzilla.) Without this patch, though, working > >> with insets in 1.4.0 on Mac is painful. > > > > I posted an answer there... my question is: should the 2195 patch work > > also for nested insets, or is one layer of insets good enough? > > (I posted an answer there, too.) But to respond to this question: I > think nesting of insets is important. The screen drawing problem I > report there is one I run into fairly often: I've also found myself > creating branches for notes to myself, and then putting a comment > inset inside the branch, so that I can print out my comments or not > easily. > > As I noted on bugzilla, I suspect fixing the problem won't cause a > speed hit, so (I hope!) we don't need to choose between speed and > nested insets.
I am not so optimistic...this is tricky stuff. The inset is wide in
order to cover up rendering artefacts ("turds") that would be left by
selective re-rendering of rows. Give up the wideness and you'll either
see artefacts or be forced to re-render everything.
But I'll sleep on it ;-)
- Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
