Martin Vermeer wrote: > > If you all are confident in the 2212 fix, it can go in. > > I am confident, but it's near-useless without also multi-par change > tracking (which would make this a useable feature). Cosmetic, as > well. So... no, not now.
Do you mean because change tracking is not useable in general without multi-par tracking? I wonder why people ever used the ct-patch for 1.3. Even if it's not perfect, 1.4's change tracking is way better than that. I opt to put 2212 in. Jürgen
