On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 05:06:37PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > If you all are confident in the 2212 fix, it can go in. > > > > I am confident, but it's near-useless without also multi-par change > > tracking (which would make this a useable feature). Cosmetic, as > > well. So... no, not now. > > Do you mean because change tracking is not useable in general without > multi-par tracking? I wonder why people ever used the ct-patch for 1.3. Even > if it's not perfect, 1.4's change tracking is way better than that. > > I opt to put 2212 in.
Okay... just make sure that there absolutely aren't any issues with it for the rest of LyX. I am pretty confident, but LyX is a complex beast. - Martin
pgpvkVT8ulbG3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
