Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 23:11 +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:30:08PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 04:54:23PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
's see if we get any user experiences on this.
It is certainly not too fast. Ideally, I'd like to get the same speed but
with smaller steps, perhaps half the jump and 0.1s delays. But no
reason to delay 1.4 for that of course. And the fewer but bigger jumps
may be an important performance issue for those with weak machines anyway.
Do you get any irregular scrolling behaviour, or page scrolls that you
"didn't ask for"?
Can you select and scroll with precision, without overshooting and
having to page scroll back?
Testing some more, I see that I often overshoot by one jump, sometimes two.
The problem then is that the jumps are so big - two jumps is a whole page,
while one jump too much is manageable without scrolling back.
I guess more delay would make it easier, but at the big price of
slowness when
selecting many pages. Big selections are slow enough as they are already.
Smaller jumps, such as 1/4 or 1/5 of a page would make it easier, even
if the
delay is reduced further to keep the same scrolling speed as now.
Seeing where I am in the document is no problem with the current speed,
the problem is more one of reaction time. I have to move the mouse
a little up to stop the scrolling.
Helge Hafting
