On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 11:01 +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > >> I guess more delay would make it easier, but at the big price of > >> slowness when > >> selecting many pages. Big selections are slow enough as they are > >> already. Smaller jumps, such as 1/4 or 1/5 of a page would make it > >> easier, even if the > >> delay is reduced further to keep the same scrolling speed as now. > > > > Yes... but hard to do within the current paradigm. Actually scroll > > speed dependence on where you keep the mouse would be best, but not > > doable in my understanding without major change. (I actually tried > > to make the 200 ms delay into a variable that could be tuned at > > runtime, but failed miserably. Does anyone know if that can be done, > > and how?) > > What emacs does, IIRC, is make scrolling speed dependent on mouse > position above or below the window. It the mouse is only just outside > the window then scrolling speed is slow. If it's a long way above > (below) the window, then scrolling is fast. > > Is it difficult to use such an idea here?
Yes. Or perhaps not, if it would be an easy way to change the timeout parameter on the fly. - Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
