On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 12:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> >> Also, you can verify by code inspection or testing (I did both) that all > >> >> proposed patches are neutral for ordinary LtR text, so we won't lose > >> >> anything by just putting it in. I would very much appreciate a second > >> >> opinion though. > >> >> > >> >> - Martin > >> > > >> | Lars? > >> > >> I'll find room to have a lookover today. > >> > >> -- > >> Lgb > > > | I committed the fixes to 1965 and 1970, as they are near-trivial. > | For the rest, I would appreciate a look, especially the section/enum > | numbering thing, as it involves a change in layout file syntax. > > Sorry that I didn'tlook at this already. > > If at all possible I'd like to avoid all layout changes now. > what are the implications?
1) LtR should remain unaffected. Business as usual.
2) It will be possible to define label strings that depend on the
language of the document. Currently used to revert the
section/sub/sub-sub order for Hebrew; but could be generalized.
It looks like this:
LabelString "[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@.\arabic{subsection}}"
[Note that "hebrew" refers to language, "arabic" to number type. Quite
different thing]
So at this point we should decide if we want such an extension to the
format, and if it should look like this. I dislike hardwiring Hebrew
into the LyX code, as we have in some places today. Fixing the section
header bug without this format change would require such hardwiring.
- Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
