On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Also, you can verify by code inspection or testing (I did both) that all > >> proposed patches are neutral for ordinary LtR text, so we won't lose > >> anything by just putting it in. I would very much appreciate a second > >> opinion though. > >> > >> - Martin > > > | Lars? > > I'll find room to have a lookover today. > > -- > Lgb
I committed the fixes to 1965 and 1970, as they are near-trivial. For the rest, I would appreciate a look, especially the section/enum numbering thing, as it involves a change in layout file syntax. - Martin
pgpmt0kgNj1ot.pgp
Description: PGP signature
