Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>
>> I accept such changes when (1) we have a patch already (2) it has been
>> well tested and (3) Lars accepts it in 1.4.0cvs. The best way to
>> proceed would be to make a patch against 1.3.6cvs and work with it for
>> some time.
>
> Unfortunately I don't have the time for this at the moment.
> But I can't imagine that the changes can cause troubles. It is just to
> put \begin and \end commands on a new line. But of course it is better
> to test such things over a certain time - so OK this is a thing for
> 1.4.0.
Isn't
foo\end{env}
semantically the same as
foo%
\end{env}
? If so, why not do that?
--
Angus
