Angus Leeming wrote:
Uwe, I didn't do anythiing with your fonts stuff because I don't think
it should go on the same page as the UI language stuff and, more
importantly, becase I was unsure whether it was finished. Why don't you
start making patches against the stuff in CVS (BRANCH_1_3_X ;-)) and
I'll start shoving it in.
Hello Angus,
It is too complicated for me as my script differs now so much from
yours. E.g. I don't use download.nsh etc. I've new scripts and
ini-files. It is easier for me to implement your changes.
But why can't we agree to an installer basis? I send my proposal to the
list and got three opinions:
Positive: Ansger, Peter Kümmel
Negative: You
That's why I changed my installer proposal but got no reply if you could
agree with it.
If you do so, we could use my script as basis as it has implemented all
stuff as in your version. (I'll implement the lastest change for the
language setting now.)
If you don't agree, I'll upload my scripts this evening to the usual
place, so that you can merge it to your version.
I'm not grumpy, but has to stop to work on the installer today - real
life is calling me ;-). (That doesn't mean that I don't have an hour a
day left.)
At the moment I've only feedback from my collegues. But most of the
ideas for the improvements are from them and they therefore like the way
I implemented it. So could I upload a version of my installer to the
usual place this evening and you move it to the Wiki, inform me where it
is, and I'll announce it there? Is this OK for you?
I want to hear what people think about the installer pages: Is it clear
enough to set the language AND the fonts on the same installer page, are
more informations about the found programs needed, could normal Win
users understand why informations about the path_prefix is given in a
summary page altough the found programs are listed before etc.
I mean the first impression of a program is important, not too much but
enough to be not decided by only two persons.
I've just got rid of all CamelCase file names. Let's stick with
lower_case ones.
What's the advantage? It was you who started with "ioSummary.ini"
instead of "io_summary.ini". I just follow your scheme.
best regards
Uwe
