On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> I set it to false because it seemed that this was wanted, but it is not
> needed. We can of course decide that -x wants a gui. The problem is that
> there are some cases where -x needs a gui and others where it does not.
> Does it hurt to use a gui even if none is needed? Then we could revert that
> part of the change, the bug fix was at another place.

What about an explicit '--no-gui' command line option?

Andre'

Reply via email to