>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: >> I set it to false because it seemed that this was wanted, but it is >> not needed. We can of course decide that -x wants a gui. The >> problem is that there are some cases where -x needs a gui and >> others where it does not. Does it hurt to use a gui even if none is >> needed? Then we could revert that part of the change, the bug fix >> was at another place. Andre> What about an explicit '--no-gui' command line option? The problem is that we do not really know which lfuns require a GUI. JMarc
