>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Martin Vermeer wrote: >> Currently however, both the toolbar buttons and the keystroke C-e >> at least, still produce font-noun and font-emph attribute-type >> charstyles. Should we, for 1.4.0, switch to inset-type character >> styles for this, and make it the preferred way, marking the text >> attribute types noun and emph as deprecated? Angus> My take: if the new way works, then use it. What's the point of Angus> writing it otherwise? Well, my take is completely different :) I think we should get rid of the Noun charstyle in std latex classes, and only keep charstyles for *ML, where that are really needed. Do you _really_ think that ``normal'' LaTeX users will thing that having the name of the style written under every emphasized word is an improvement? As they are I think they really hamper the reading of the document on screen. They are distractiing and take a _lot_ of screen estate to convey an information (emphasize, noun) which is not really needed, since people see on screen what the style is. Of course, this is not true for a style like "First Name", but this is not what we are doing here. Note that this does not prevent people from defining their own charstyles in their classes. JMarc
