And if you tried the MinGW compiler you'd find that this statement was just wrong.
So you tried my patch with Ming? How did it fare?
Why make a big deal about this.
Because you are asking me to do things which I can not test. Therefore, I'm dependent on others to do the work, which adds required synchronisation points to the process, when everything could be done with one operation instead of 5.
So you believe that it is a good idea that the documents in CVS are using an old version?
Sure. Why not if it enables us to also test lyx2lyx for free?
Just leave one of them unconverted.
Regards, Asger
