On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 08:03:52PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> I found some inconsistencies that may have been the problem for Jürgen: 
> member functions declared with an "int" argument, but defined with an 
> "int const" argument

That's fine. The toplevel const does not change the function signature,
it's an implementation detail. Pretty much the same level as

  int i = 5;   vs  int const i = 5;

Andre'

Reply via email to