On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 08:03:52PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > I found some inconsistencies that may have been the problem for Jürgen: > member functions declared with an "int" argument, but defined with an > "int const" argument
That's fine. The toplevel const does not change the function signature, it's an implementation detail. Pretty much the same level as int i = 5; vs int const i = 5; Andre'