Am Freitag, 3. Dezember 2004 20:20 schrieb Andre Poenitz: > Why is ' < 0 ' equivalent to ' != npos' ?
The type changed from a signed one to a unsigned one. Based on a suggestion by Angus I introduced npos, because we were not sure wether values < 0 were used as a special value. The assert checks for valid indices, and in this respect ' < 0 ' and ' != npos' are equivalent. Georg
