Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 01:47:33PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> > Humm... I don't see that here (in CoordBranch). Do you get every time, or
>> > only once in a while? Can you send a backtrace?
>>
>> This is important. I don't understand why could we be drawing at such large
>> coordinates. Are you sure this is coordbranch? [btw, you don't happend to
>> have a > 4000 pixels high monitor, do you?]
>
| Hm... you could just merge CoordBranch back to HEAD. From wht I can tell
| it is now uniformly better than HEAD.
>
| "Strictly better", in fact.
>
>> I'm sure there are many other possible optimizations we could do. OTOH, I
>> don't think this is the right time for optimization.
>
| Me neither. Anywa, I think it's safe to promise that 1.4.0 won't be
| slower than 1.3.x as there is no conceptual change to the worse. On the
| contrary, as nicely shown by loading times...
Loading times is not the crux of everything.
I think we must look at how much we redraw on update as well.
--
Lgb
