Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > | On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >>> But we need more, and as I said in another mail: Just about everyone >>> (except from the submitter himself) can confirm a bug. >>> You don't need any particular skills (most often), just the time to >>> check if the reported problem actually exists. >> > | So it's just a matter of: > | * Getting a list of unconfirmed bugs, and choose one > | * Try to replicate the bug, and if you can do that you 'confirm' it? >> > | That sounds *too* simple, what's the catch?
The catch is what "everybody" above means. E.g. for bug 830, I am not a member of the set "everybody". The only choice I have is to leave the bug as unconfirmed. I guess this is not intentional, but it might explain why there are so many unconfirmed bugs. BTW, did you (Lars) see my and Johns comments to bug 1244? Georg
