Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Vox wrote:
> > latex: eps, eps and eps > > pdflatex: jpg, png, pdf > > docbook: same as above if going thru latex, else jpg, png and png > > htlatex: ??? > > others: ??? > What does the first, second and third format column mean? Photo, lossless bitmap graphic, vector format (I know, I should have said that) > > Hm, thinking about it, Ghostscript can also wrap PDF files. So maybe we > > could drop EPS altogether and write a small TeX-Package which converts > > JPG / PNG / PDF to Ghostscript EPS automatically. > IMHO we should only rely on special tex packages if it is absolutely > necessary. Installing new tex packages is not easy for many people. Pity. > >> like subfigure that are only available in the graphics inset. > > > > Drop it. Replace by new environment around graphic: > > <subfigure> <graphic ... /> <caption>La la la</caption></subfigure> > If you could translate this to a lyx construct (inset, layout or whatever) > with an easy user interface, that would be great! I think there are other people which are better in writing insets, remember I'm a newbie? Josà wrote: |> > Why not use the same uniqueID() that is used by the graphics inset? |> Only registered its existence after I was done. Also it's in anonymous |> namespace in insetgraphics and I needed it in math_hullinset. | Come on, you are joking, right? ;-) Angus wrote: | Ooohh, that's a poor excuse. Move it into support then. Seriously, as a newbie I still feel a little shy when reorganizing code. Ciao /Andreas
