John Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 07:11:11PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Just what I am saying... let's fiddle right away, we don't need the
>> DTD for that.
>
| A DTD ... even if it's in our own "language" ... gives us a skeleton
| to work off of.
>
| The fiddling that I'm thinking of is, "Do we make this a separate tag?
| Or do we nest it inside of another one?" Or, "what name should we
| call this tag/namespace/attribute?"
>
| With a DTD ... which is just one file ... it's only a matter of
| applying a regexp to change your working element names into final
| ones. But, ya gotta have da working structure, first.
>
>> Let's see some code :-)
>
| I just grabbed some online docs about XSchema. Let's decide first
| what we wanna speak: DTD or XSchema? I'll whip up something based on
| your example once we have a consensus...
I'd like DTD... but of course that is because I don't know XScheme
(that well).
One crucial point is that our parser must be able to validate. Besides
there are DTD -> XScheme converters.
--
Lgb
