José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:42:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Updated DTD and patch.
>>
>> The environments deeper,paragraphparamters,paragraphcontent has been
>> removed.
>
| That can only be a good sign. :-)
>
| I have annotated your proposal with some small notes bellow.
|
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
| ...
| Any particular reason for the order params, preamble, option?
| Why isn't the option a parameter?
Because options was implmented different from the other params and
plain cdata does not cut it. I need <![CDATA[ ]]> for it.
I am not sure that I like the un-typed params at all, and I am
thinking about changing them to separate elements.
|
>> <!-- layout should of course have been a IDREF to the layouts actually -->
>> <!-- found in the different textclasses. Is that possible to -->
>> <!-- accomplish? (Lgb) -->
>
| I doubt, we don't want to bind the lyx dtd with the different textclasses,
| that is the advantage of extensibility.
I am not so sure.
But I agree that you should be able to view a document that you don't
have the layout for. So to make that work you would have to distribute
the xml for the textclass inline in the document. Let's think a bit
more about this one.
There would be a common dtd for all the layout.
>
>> <!-- I really want the layout to be a NMTOKEN so we should change the -->
>> <!-- layout files a bit so that there are no spaces in layout names. -->
>> <!-- (Lgb) -->
>
| But there are no layout with spaces in its name. At least none that we
| distribute, and I don't think we support them.
Hmmm... when I change CDATA to NMTOKEN now it validates.... that
wasn't always the case. Well NMTOKEN it is.
>
>> <!ELEMENT paragraph (#PCDATA | font | foot | marginal | note |
>> latexcommand | quotes | labelwidthstring | accent | tabular |
>> vspace | newline | ert | formula | formulamacro | graphics
>> | bibitem | float | optarg | specialchar | space | paragraph)*>
>
| IMHO, although now it is implemented as an inset the optarg should be a
| paragraph parameter. I doesn't make sense any other way.
Our internal format does not make that easy.
| Also since you have here the new line don't we miss the page break, aka
| newpage?
My test document is not good enough.
--
Lgb
