Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Could you check it out, please? If all is well I guess that it can
>> be backported to 1.3.x.
>
> Angus, the output of the first two entries in the combox is
> reversed. I.e., the first entry (labelled [#ID]), produces \citet,
> which is "Name [#ID]". The second, labelled Name [#ID], produces
> \citep, which is [#ID].
Ok, I'll revert the patch in my tree and try and sort out the issues
you describe below.
> I have detected another problem wrt jurabib/natbib (introduced by
> me): In Jurabib, I have added an extra entry (\cite, which produces
> Name/<content of "before">). But when I switch from natbib to
> jurabib, clicking on the insets shows the wrong style (off by one).
> Any idea what to do on this?
Will have a go.
> Finally, since jurabib does not support numerical styles, jurabib
> and numerical should be mutually exclusive (currently there is a
> problem when switching from Jurabib/numerical to natbib).
Ok, then we should define
enum CiteType {
PLAIN,
NATBIB_AUTHORYEAR,
NATBIB_NUMERICAL,
JURABIB
};
and use it rather than this hodge-podge of bools.
Thanks for the feedback,
--
Angus
