Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | My take on this: QWidgetStack is the way to go if we want to
>> | emulate emacs' minibuffer. Ie, a single 'apparent' widget that
>> | both displays messages and receives input. However, John has
>> | argued that these requirements are best served by two, separate
>> | widgets. I tend to agree with him.
>>
>> wasn't that "status" in wone widget, and input and info in another
>> widget?
>
| Sorry, I don't follow you. I thought that the idea was for a widget to
| show feedback on and for a widget to input commands in.
>
| What's your vision?
Two visible widgets (like emacs): 1. status info 2. the minibuffer.
if the internal implementation for 2 is two stacked widgets that is
ok.
--
Lgb
