Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | My take on this: QWidgetStack is the way to go if we want to > | emulate emacs' minibuffer. Ie, a single 'apparent' widget that > | both displays messages and receives input. However, John has > | argued that these requirements are best served by two, separate > | widgets. I tend to agree with him. > > wasn't that "status" in wone widget, and input and info in another > widget?
Sorry, I don't follow you. I thought that the idea was for a widget to show feedback on and for a widget to input commands in. What's your vision? -- Angus
