Leuven, E. wrote: > but i thought that license changes (like reverting to the GPL) need > to be accepted by every contributor (which prevented us changing the > license to the general version you suggest above in the first place)
But, my point is that "a special exception to do something that no longer needs a special exception to do it" is meaningless. If the clause is meaningless then does it have any legal standing and, if not, does the licence not revert naturally to the GPL anyway? -- Angus
