Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>>>>> It compiles if I change line 838 of src/Cursor.C from
>>>>>>> if (t.operator->() != anchor_[depth()].inset())
>>>>>
>>>> | I wonder what has been smoked here to think this is a nice
>>>> | construct...
>>>
>> | Agreed. What I'm confused about is why operator->() behaves
>> | differently. Can you shed some light?
>>
>> Does it?
>> I saw no differences.
>
| Now who's been smoking the wacky backy?
>
| Folish me for thinking that you were proposing an alternative fix for
| Georg's bug report. You're just making the code prettier.
That code (as it were) compiled perfectly withe my compiler (gcc 3.3.2
and gcc 3.4)
--
Lgb
