Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >>>>>> It compiles if I change line 838 of src/Cursor.C from >>>>>> if (t.operator->() != anchor_[depth()].inset()) >>>> >>> | I wonder what has been smoked here to think this is a nice >>> | construct... >> > | Agreed. What I'm confused about is why operator->() behaves > | differently. Can you shed some light? > > Does it? > I saw no differences.
Now who's been smoking the wacky backy? Folish me for thinking that you were proposing an alternative fix for Georg's bug report. You're just making the code prettier. -- Angus
