On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:01:38PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > No, the cursor top is its 'tip', i.e. in the insets. > > But this new slice will be the position inside this tip, right?
No. > (when you talk of main LyX text you refer to inner one?). Or maybe > not. If you refer to the root one, read on. I use 'main text' to refere to the big root text. > I don't understand why we have to distinguish between "main" LyXText and > inner LyXText at all. Me neither, that's why I am trying to build a scheme that does not distinguish between them if possible. That's why I don't store the root slice separately but at the bottom of the stack of inset slices. > The old LCursor used to be enough to point to the inner inset (it > was void for the main one). Yes, but it started of in the 'outermost inset', not in the root text. > We only miss the position in that inset. > I.e. one can think that we only miss an aditional textcursor to the > old LCUrsor? (or its mathed/text hybrid eq.) Indeed. And I added this textcursor to the bottom of the LCursor stack (or later the hybrid), so we've all of them together in one place: LCursor. Andre'
